John it's possible that we are talking about different things here. What I am saying is, the black n tan look should not speak louder than the actual whole package that the GS dog breed represents. We got the diversity in colors and that's good BUT there should be no "diversity" when it comes to temperament. I mean, look at what the SV did to the breed, we got black n red (not even tan) dogs with crappy temperaments. I am not saying color or pigment is not important, after all, these things (temperament, bone structure, pigment, overall looks etc) are all coming under one "logo", the German Shepherd dog.
Further more, I actually believe some took this "sable dogs are better working dogs" to an extreme and the root of it was and is money. In Romania, quite a few so-called breeders sell sable GS pups claiming to be "working line" pups JUST because they are sable.
So the point I was trying to make was and is, we got variety when it comes to looks, but let's not play around when it comes to temperament. I can totally understand what Axx was saying, after all, I am a great fan of the classic black n tan GS dog but nevertheless, I believe it is important that we do not state that black n tan GS dogs are good by default; we need to teach those interested in the breed, to consider the whole package.
I hope my English is good enough to make the point..